Weaver v. Farrington

New York Court of Common Pleas

Weaver v. Farrington

27 N.Y.S. 971, 7 Misc. 405, 58 N.Y. St. Rep. 58

DecidedMarch 15, 1894

StatusPublished

This text of 27 N.Y.S. 971 (Weaver v. Farrington) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Common Pleas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Weaver v. Farrington, 27 N.Y.S. 971, 7 Misc. 405, 58 N.Y. St. Rep. 58 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1894).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The facts which the appellant Farrington, the indorser, sets up in his answer, establish the right of the plaintiff to recover, for, while alleging that he indorsed the note for the accommodation of Blair, he avers, substantially, that the latter transferred it to the plaintiff as collateral security for an existing indebtedness of Blair, and nowhere alleges that there was either fraud or diversion in such transfer. In the case of Bank v. Livingston, 55 N. Y. St. Rep. 394, 26 N. Y. Supp. 25, we held that the transferee of a negotiable note, taken before maturity as collateral security for a precedent debt, is a holder for value, and he may enforce it against the accommodation maker and indorser, if there be no diversion or other fraud in its acquisition. None of the defenses which were attempted to be' proved on the trial were set up in the answer, and were therefore properly excluded. The judgment must be affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The facts which the appellant Farrington, the indorser, sets up in his answer, establish the right of the plaintiff to recover, for, while alleging that he indorsed the note for the accommodation of Blair, he avers, substantially, that the latter transferred it to the plaintiff as collateral security for an existing indebtedness of Blair, and nowhere alleges that there was either fraud or diversion in such transfer. In the case of Bank v. Livingston, 55 N. Y. St. Rep. 394, 26 N. Y. Supp. 25, we held that the transferee of a negotiable note, taken before maturity as collateral security for a precedent debt, is a holder for value, and he may enforce it against the accommodation maker and indorser, if there be no diversion or other fraud in its acquisition. None of the defenses which were attempted to be' proved on the trial were set up in the answer, and were therefore properly excluded. The judgment must be affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

27 N.Y.S. 971, 7 Misc. 405, 58 N.Y. St. Rep. 58, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/weaver-v-farrington-nyctcompl-1894.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack