Weaver Others v. Chace

5 R.I. 356
Supreme Court of Rhode Island·Decided September 6, 1858·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Ames, C. J.

This decree must be affirmed. We can conceive of no stronger case for the appointment of a non-resident administrator, within the discretion given to the court by ch. 156, § 6, of the Rev. Stats., than that of a husband, entitled, by section 7 of the same chapter, to administer on his wife’s estate, in case of her intestacy, and without account. There are no debts — there is to be no distribution — and he is to retain as his own the whole personal estate of his deceased wife ; and if, as has been suggested, questions are likely to arise as to what was her personal estate, he is the most proper person, in his own name, to vindicate his own rights.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Weaver Others v. Chace, 5 R.I. 356 (R.I. 1858).

5 R.I. 356 (Weaver Others v. Chace) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Grogan v. O'Neill
136 A. 842 (Supreme Court of Rhode Island, 1927)
Battey v. Mathewson
51 A. 102 (Supreme Court of Rhode Island, 1902)