Weaver-Loughridge Lumber Co. v. Kirkland

131 So. 784, 99 Fla. 426
Supreme Court of Florida·Decided November 7, 1927·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Bill of Complaint' was filed seeking to cancel and have declared null and void a certain conveyance on the ground of fraud. Answer was filed and testimony taken before a master. The chancellor found in favor of the defendants and dismissed the bill.

Questions of fact only are presented by the assignments of error. There is ample evidence to sustain the decree and the case is well within the familiar principle that the findings of the chancellor on the facts will not' be disturbed by an appellate court unless such findings are clearly shown to be erroneous. Kreher v. Morley, 84 Fla. 121, 92 So. R. 686; Smith v. Dowling 81 Fla. 867, 89 So. R. 315; Travis v. Travis, 81 Fla. 309, 87 So. R. 762; Commercial Bank of Ocala v. First National Bank, 80 Fla. 685, 87 So. R. 315; Hill v. Beacham, 79 Fla. 430, 85 So. R. 147. Greenblatt v. Bissell Dry Goods Co., 85 Fla. 82, 95 So. R. 302; Edney v. Stinson, 90 Fla. 335, 105 So. R. 821; Birgess v. Wirt, 91 Fla. 425, 108 So. R. 169; Lluis v. Lluis, 91 Fla. 706, 108 So. R. 671.

Affirmed.

Whitfield, P. J., and Terrell and Buford, J. J. concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Weaver-Loughridge Lumber Co. v. Kirkland, 131 So. 784, 99 Fla. 426 (Fla. 1927).

131 So. 784 (Weaver-Loughridge Lumber Co. v. Kirkland) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

White Furniture Company v. Mather
17 So. 2d 118 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1943)
Gardiner v. Goertner
149 So. 186 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1932)
Turnipseed Et Ux. v. Brown
136 So. 343 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1931)