Weatherwax v. Tironi

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Weatherwax v. Tironi

25 A.D.2d 712, 268 N.Y.S.2d 727, 1966 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4649

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 30, 1966

StatusPublished

This text of 25 A.D.2d 712 (Weatherwax v. Tironi) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Weatherwax v. Tironi, 25 A.D.2d 712, 268 N.Y.S.2d 727, 1966 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4649 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1966).

Pincite

Opinion

Memorandum by the Court. Appeals from orders of the Supreme Court at Special Term which granted partial summary judgments in actions to recover for professional services rendered and remitted the actions to a Jury Term for assessment of damages. Appellants’ opposition to the motions rested on their denials, set forth in their answers, of certain allegations of the complaint, in some instances the denials being of information or belief; and in each ease appellants failed to offer any proof either to establish a defense or to contradict the factual averments of the moving papers which adequately established the cause of action; and appellants, in fact, declined the adjournment that Special Term suggested be taken to enable them to submit proof. Orders affirmed, with $10 costs.

Gibson, P. J., Heriihy, Reynolds, Taylor and Aulisi, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Memorandum by the Court. Appeals from orders of the Supreme Court at Special Term which granted partial summary judgments in actions to recover for professional services rendered and remitted the actions to a Jury Term for assessment of damages. Appellants’ opposition to the motions rested on their denials, set forth in their answers, of certain allegations of the complaint, in some instances the denials being of information or belief; and in each ease appellants failed to offer any proof either to establish a defense or to contradict the factual averments of the moving papers which adequately established the cause of action; and appellants, in fact, declined the adjournment that Special Term suggested be taken to enable them to submit proof. Orders affirmed, with $10 costs.

Gibson, P. J., Heriihy, Reynolds, Taylor and Aulisi, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

25 A.D.2d 712, 268 N.Y.S.2d 727, 1966 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4649, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/weatherwax-v-tironi-nyappdiv-1966.