Weathersbee v. Blanton
This text of 9 S.E. 817 (Weathersbee v. Blanton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Opinion by
[604]*604A testator expressed the desire that his infant daughter should be well educated, according to her degree and circumstances in life. Her guardian becoming possessed of her patrimony when she was sixteen years of age, and finding her education very defi[605]*605cient, expended $1,799.20 in the next five years on her maintenance and education, of which only $758.95 was income — thus showing an encroachment upon the corpus of her estate in these five years to the extent of $1,040.25.
In action by this ward against her guardian after site attained her majority, the Circuit Judge (Witherspoon) sustained and approved this expenditure of the corpus, and this court declared itself unwilling to say that the Circuit Judge transcended his powers. Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
9 S.E. 817, 31 S.C. 604, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/weathersbee-v-blanton-sc-1889.