Weathers v. Sovereign Camp, W. O. W.

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Weathers v. Sovereign Camp, W. O. W.

116 S.E. 927, 123 S.C. 493, 1923 S.C. LEXIS 80

CourtSupreme Court of South Carolina

DecidedJanuary 18, 1923

Docket11112

StatusPublished

This text of 116 S.E. 927 (Weathers v. Sovereign Camp, W. O. W.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Weathers v. Sovereign Camp, W. O. W., 116 S.E. 927, 123 S.C. 493, 1923 S.C. LEXIS 80 (S.C. 1923).

Pincite

Opinions

January 18, 1923. The opinion of the Court was delivered by This is the second appeal in this case. 119 S.C. 402;112 S.E., 44. The first trial resulted in a verdict for the defendant; the second trial resulted in a verdict for the plaintiff. We are unable to discover wherein there is any material difference in the testimony or the question involved in the two appeals. The exceptions are, therefore, overruled, and the appeal dismissed.

MESSRS. JUSTICES WATTS, FRASER and MARION concur.

MR. JUSTICE COTHRAN: I dissent. This appeal is not controlled by the former. In that appeal the judgment was reversed upon the ground that the question of waiver of the requirement as to the certificate and warranty should have been submitted to the jury. In this appeal the question is as to the condition that the insured shall continue in good health for 30 days, as to which, in my opinion, there is no evidence of waiver.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

January 18, 1923. The opinion of the Court was delivered by This is the second appeal in this case. 119 S.C. 402;112 S.E., 44. The first trial resulted in a verdict for the defendant; the second trial resulted in a verdict for the plaintiff. We are unable to discover wherein there is any material difference in the testimony or the question involved in the two appeals. The exceptions are, therefore, overruled, and the appeal dismissed.

MESSRS. JUSTICES WATTS, FRASER and MARION concur.

MR. JUSTICE COTHRAN: I dissent. This appeal is not controlled by the former. In that appeal the judgment was reversed upon the ground that the question of waiver of the requirement as to the certificate and warranty should have been submitted to the jury. In this appeal the question is as to the condition that the insured shall continue in good health for 30 days, as to which, in my opinion, there is no evidence of waiver.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

116 S.E. 927, 123 S.C. 493, 1923 S.C. LEXIS 80, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/weathers-v-sovereign-camp-w-o-w-sc-1923.

Opinions

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack