Weathers v. . Borders

28 S.E. 524, 121 N.C. 387
CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina
DecidedSeptember 5, 1897
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 28 S.E. 524 (Weathers v. . Borders) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Weathers v. . Borders, 28 S.E. 524, 121 N.C. 387 (N.C. 1897).

Opinion

Faircloth, C. J.:

Defendant and her husband contracted with plaintiffs verbally, to have a house built on her land and materials furnished for the building. The house was built and paid for except $37.81. Defendants, alleging that bad work was done and inferior material used, refused to pay the balance. Plaintiffs sue for balance and ask to have their judgment declared a lied on the house and lot. This is the only question. Plaintiffs admitted the- contract was not in writing and thereupdn his Honor held that they could not recover on their own showing and adjudged that the feme defendant go without day and that plaintiffs have judgment against the husband for the balance. Plaintiffs appealed from that part of the judgment dismissing the action as to the/eme defendant.

It has already been held that a wife cannot subject her land or separate interest therein, in any way, except by a regular conveyance executed as required by the Statute, and then the intent, to charge her separate estate must appear on the face of the instrument creating the liability.

*388 Slie may cliarge her personal estate by herself or by an agent, for her necessary personal expenses, or for the support of her family, or to pay her ante-nuptial debts, without the written assent of her husband, and may make him her agent to manage her separate estate. Code, Section 1826; Thompson v. Taylor, 110 N. C., 70; Loan Association v. Black, 119 N. C., 323; Bazemore v. Mountain, 121 N. C., at the present Term.

She cannot ratify a void contract. See second case cited supra. No error. Judgment affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Johnson v. Johnson
418 B.R. 682 (E.D. North Carolina, 2009)
Stout v. . Perry
67 S.E. 757 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1910)
Ball v. Paquin.
52 S.E. 410 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1905)
Weathers v. . Borders
32 S.E. 881 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1899)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
28 S.E. 524, 121 N.C. 387, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/weathers-v-borders-nc-1897.