Weatherly v. Covington
This text of 28 S.E. 1 (Weatherly v. Covington) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
The opinion of the Court was delivered by
The complaint in this case was for the recovery of the possession of personal property, and [56]*56damages for unlawful taking and detention thereof. A demurrer was interposed, on the ground that the complaint did not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action, which was overruled by the Circuit Court.
Appellants except thereto as follows: “Because it is respectfully submitted that his Honor, Judge Watts, erred in overruling the demurrer to plaintiff’s complaint, thereby holding that it stated facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action against the defendants.”
Respondent insists that this exception can not be considered, because too general. We so hold. State v. Turner, 18 S. C., 103; McDaniel v. Stokes, 19 S. C., 61; Cureton v. Stokes, 20 S. C., 583; Talbott & Sons v. Padgett, 30 S. C., 99; Sims v. Jones, 43 S. C., 91; Marshall v. Creel, 44 S. C., 485, and many other cases.
The judgment of the Circuit Court is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
28 S.E. 1, 51 S.C. 55, 1897 S.C. LEXIS 52, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/weatherly-v-covington-sc-1897.