Weatherly v. Covington

28 S.E. 1, 51 S.C. 55, 1897 S.C. LEXIS 52
Supreme Court of South Carolina·Decided October 23, 1897·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinions

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Justice Jones.

The complaint in this case was for the recovery of the possession of personal property, and [56] damages for unlawful taking and detention thereof. A demurrer was interposed, on the ground that the complaint did not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action, which was overruled by the Circuit Court.

Appellants except thereto as follows: “Because it is respectfully submitted that his Honor, Judge Watts, erred in overruling the demurrer to plaintiff’s complaint, thereby holding that it stated facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action against the defendants.”

Respondent insists that this exception can not be considered, because too general. We so hold. State v. Turner, 18 S. C., 103; McDaniel v. Stokes, 19 S. C., 61; Cureton v. Stokes, 20 S. C., 583; Talbott & Sons v. Padgett, 30 S. C., 99; Sims v. Jones, 43 S. C., 91; Marshall v. Creel, 44 S. C., 485, and many other cases.

The judgment of the Circuit Court is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Weatherly v. Covington, 28 S.E. 1, 51 S.C. 55, 1897 S.C. LEXIS 52 (S.C. 1897).

28 S.E. 1 (Weatherly v. Covington) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Avalanche Funding, LLC v. Arif
E.D. California, 2021
Williams Ex Rel. Estate of Williams v. Regula
222 S.E.2d 7 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1976)
Boyer v. Loftin-Woodard, Inc.
146 S.E.2d 606 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1966)
Solley v. Weaver
146 S.E.2d 164 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1966)
State v. Danelly
107 S.E. 149 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1921)