Weatherly v. Bristow

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Weatherly v. Bristow

1916 OK 277, 164 P. 979, 56 Okla. 469, 1916 Okla. LEXIS 730

CourtSupreme Court of Oklahoma

DecidedMarch 7, 1916

Docket6096

StatusPublished

This text of 1916 OK 277 (Weatherly v. Bristow) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Weatherly v. Bristow, 1916 OK 277, 164 P. 979, 56 Okla. 469, 1916 Okla. LEXIS 730 (Okla. 1916).

Pincite

Opinion

Opinion by

RITTENHOUSE, C.

It is contended that a written demand for the return of usury, as condition precedent to the commencement of an action under section 1005, Rev. Laws 1910, should be for the return of the amount of interest received in excess of the legal rate, and *470 not for the whole interest received. Subsequent to the filing of briefs, the case of Ardmore State Bank v. E. H. Thompson, 57 Okla. —, 164 Pac. 977, w|as decided adversely to this contention.

The judgment should therefore be affirmed.

By the Court: It is so ordered.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI