Weatherly, Rohn M.
This text of Weatherly, Rohn M. (Weatherly, Rohn M.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS
NO. PD-0154-21
ROHN M. WEATHERLY, Appellant
v.
THE STATE OF TEXAS
ON APPELLANT’S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW FROM THE SECOND COURT OF APPEALS TARRANT COUNTY
RICHARDSON, J., filed a concurring opinion.
CONCURRING OPINION
Today the Court refuses Appellant’s Petition for Discretionary Review. We have
previously explained that “[t]his Court does not lack jurisdiction to consider Applicant’s
habeas application. . . . [t]herefore, this Court will abstain from deciding Applicant’s
habeas claims until Applicant has exhausted his appellate remedies with regard to the
judgment nunc pro tunc.” Ex parte Weatherly, No. WR-61,215-09 (Tex. Crim. App.
February 26, 2020) (not designated for publication). 2
While I agree with the Court’s decision, I write separately to indicate that Appellant
may be entitled to relief under Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, as
we noted in the prior order cited above.
FILED: October 20, 2021
DO NOT PUBLISH
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Weatherly, Rohn M., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/weatherly-rohn-m-texcrimapp-2021.