Weatherby v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Weatherby v. State

113 S.E. 23, 28 Ga. App. 755, 1922 Ga. App. LEXIS 834

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedJuly 11, 1922

Docket13629

StatusPublished

This text of 113 S.E. 23 (Weatherby v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Weatherby v. State, 113 S.E. 23, 28 Ga. App. 755, 1922 Ga. App. LEXIS 834 (Ga. Ct. App. 1922).

Pincite

Opinion

Broyles, C. J.

1. The alleged newly discovered evidence upon which the amendment to the motion for a new trial was based is merely cumulative and impeaching in character, and is not such evidence as would probably cause a different verdict upon another trial of the case.

2. The verdict was amply authorized by the evidence, and the court did not err in refusing to grant a new trial.

Judgment, affirmed.

Luke and Bloodworth, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Broyles, C. J.

1. The alleged newly discovered evidence upon which the amendment to the motion for a new trial was based is merely cumulative and impeaching in character, and is not such evidence as would probably cause a different verdict upon another trial of the case.

2. The verdict was amply authorized by the evidence, and the court did not err in refusing to grant a new trial.

Judgment, affirmed.

Luke and Bloodworth, concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

113 S.E. 23, 28 Ga. App. 755, 1922 Ga. App. LEXIS 834, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/weatherby-v-state-gactapp-1922.