Weatherby v. State

78 S.E. 1014, 13 Ga. App. 170, 1913 Ga. App. LEXIS 87
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedAugust 11, 1913
Docket5026
StatusPublished

This text of 78 S.E. 1014 (Weatherby v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Weatherby v. State, 78 S.E. 1014, 13 Ga. App. 170, 1913 Ga. App. LEXIS 87 (Ga. Ct. App. 1913).

Opinion

Hill, C. J.

1. The verdict does not depend solely upon circumstantial evidence, a confession having been shown; and, in the absence of a timely written request, the trial judge did not err in failing to give in charge the law of circumstantial evidence, as contained in the Penal Code (1910), § 1010. Benton v. State, 9 Ga. App. 422 (71 S. E. 498); Holt v. State, 7 Ga. App. 77 (66 S. E. 279). '

2. No error of law being assigned except as indicated above, and the verdict being supported by the evidence, the judgment refusing a new trial is Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Holt v. State
66 S.E. 279 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1909)
Benton v. State
71 S.E. 498 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1911)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
78 S.E. 1014, 13 Ga. App. 170, 1913 Ga. App. LEXIS 87, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/weatherby-v-state-gactapp-1913.