Weatherby v. State
78 S.E. 1014, 13 Ga. App. 170, 1913 Ga. App. LEXIS 87
Opinion
1. The verdict does not depend solely upon circumstantial evidence, a confession having been shown; and, in the absence of a timely written request, the trial judge did not err in failing to give in charge the law of circumstantial evidence, as contained in the Penal Code (1910), § 1010. Benton v. State, 9 Ga. App. 422 (71 S. E. 498); Holt v. State, 7 Ga. App. 77 (66 S. E. 279). '
2. No error of law being assigned except as indicated above, and the verdict being supported by the evidence, the judgment refusing a new trial is Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Weatherby v. State, 78 S.E. 1014, 13 Ga. App. 170, 1913 Ga. App. LEXIS 87 (Ga. Ct. App. 1913).
78 S.E. 1014 (Weatherby v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Holt v. State
66 S.E. 279 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1909)
Benton v. State
71 S.E. 498 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1911)