Weary v. State

596 So. 2d 952, 1992 Ala. Crim. App. LEXIS 166, 1992 WL 95082
Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama·Decided March 27, 1992·No. CR-90-928·Published

Opinion

ON RETURN TO REMAND

McMILLAN, Judge.

We remanded this case to the trial court with instructions to determine whether the appellant wished to pursue his direct appeal. The trial court has now filed its return, which states that the appellant, appearing with his counsel in open court, has “informed the court that he does not wish to pursue this appeal.”

[953] For the reason stated, the appeal is due to be, and it is hereby, dismissed.

APPEAL DISMISSED.

All Judges concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Weary v. State, 596 So. 2d 952, 1992 Ala. Crim. App. LEXIS 166, 1992 WL 95082 (Ala. Ct. App. 1992).

596 So. 2d 952 (Weary v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.