Weart v. Cruser

13 A. 36, 49 N.J.L. 475, 1887 N.J. LEXIS 27
Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided March 15, 1887·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The judgmént in this case should be affirmed, for the reasons given by the court below.

[481]*481For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Depue, Dixon, Knapp, Parker, Reed, Scudder, Yan Syckel, Brown, Clement, Cole, McGregor'. 13. For reversal — None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Weart v. Cruser, 13 A. 36, 49 N.J.L. 475, 1887 N.J. LEXIS 27 (N.J. 1887).

13 A. 36 (Weart v. Cruser) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Sauls v. Cox
67 N.E.2d 187 (Illinois Supreme Court, 1946)
Ako v. Russell
32 Haw. 769 (Hawaii Supreme Court, 1933)