Wearing v. Bovis & Lend Lease, Inc.

37 F. App'x 609
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided June 6, 2002·No. No. 01-2391·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Jacob Wearing appeals the district court’s orders denying his motion for a permanent injunction and granting Defendant’s motion for summary judgment in this employment action. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s orders and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Wearing v. Bovis Lend Lease, Inc., No. CA-00-880-5-H-3 (E.D.N.C. Aug. 23 & Nov. 15, 2001). We deny Wearing’s motions for a default judgment, to deny Defendant response, and for relief under Fed.R.Civ.P. 54(c). Finally, we dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are ade[610] quately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Wearing v. Bovis & Lend Lease, Inc., 37 F. App'x 609 (4th Cir. 2002).

37 F. App'x 609 (Wearing v. Bovis & Lend Lease, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Wearing v. Bovis Lend Lease, Inc
537 U.S. 1204 (Supreme Court, 2003)