Wear v. Lee

87 Mo. 358
Supreme Court of Missouri·Decided October 15, 1885·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

Brack, J.

Where the payee to whom the check is delivered by the drawer receives it in the same place where the bank on which it is drawn is located he may preserve recourse against the drawer by presenting it for payment at any time before the close of banking hours on the .next day, and if, in the meantime, the bank fails, the loss will be the drawer’s. Ban. on Neg. Inst., secs. 1590, 1591; 2 Parsons on Notes and Bills, 73 ; Story on Bills, sec. 471. Plaintiffs first instruction should have been given. Reversed and remanded.

All concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Wear v. Lee, 87 Mo. 358 (Mo. 1885).

87 Mo. 358 (Wear v. Lee) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Beckman v. Kinder
165 S.W.2d 311 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1942)
Farm and Home Savings and Loan Assn. v. Stubbs
98 S.W.2d 320 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1936)
Maxwell v. Durham
297 S.W. 94 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1927)
Koch v. Sanford Loan & Realty Co.
286 S.W. 732 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1926)
Morris v. Eufaula National Bank
122 Ala. 580 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1898)
Wear v. Lee
26 Mo. App. 99 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1887)