Weams v. Burkhalter

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided July 9, 1996·No. 96-40187·Unpublished

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

__________________

No. 96-40187 Conference Calendar __________________

WAYNE P. WEAMS,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

PHIL BURKHALTER; CHAMBER COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT,

Defendants-Appellees.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. G-95-CV-138 - - - - - - - - - - June 26, 1996 Before HIGGINBOTHAM, BARKSDALE, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Wayne Weams, #688726, appeals from the district court's

dismissal as frivolous pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(d) of his

civil rights complaint. Weams contends that he stated a valid

Eighth Amendment violation for denial of adequate medical care.

He has abandoned his claim concerning the absence of shower mats

by failing to brief it. See Yohey v. Collins, 985 F.2d 222, 225

* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4. No. 96-40187 -2-

(5th Cir. 1993). We have reviewed the record and Weams' brief

and AFFIRM the order of dismissal for essentially the reasons

adopted by the district court. See Weams v. Burkhalter et al.,

No. G-95-CV-138 (S.D. Tex. Feb. 26, 1996). Weams is WARNED that

the filing of frivolous appeals in the future will result in the

imposition of sanctions.

AFFIRMED; SANCTIONS WARNING ISSUED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Weams v. Burkhalter, (5th Cir. 1996).

Weams v. Burkhalter (Weams v. Burkhalter) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related