Weakley v. State

147 So. 926, 25 Ala. App. 694
CourtAlabama Court of Appeals
DecidedApril 4, 1933
Docket8 Div. 654.
StatusPublished

This text of 147 So. 926 (Weakley v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Alabama Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Weakley v. State, 147 So. 926, 25 Ala. App. 694 (Ala. Ct. App. 1933).

Opinion

SAMFORD, Judge.

The court has read this record en banc and has reached the conclusion that a new trial should be granted. While there is a scintilla of evidence tending to prove the corpus delicti and the defendant’s connection with five or six bottles of home brew found by the officers hidden in a trunk in an upstairs room of defendant’s residence, we do not think the evidence rises to that degree of certainty which is necessary to a conviction in a criminal case.

The trial judge should have granted the defendant’s motion for a new trial, and for that reason the judgment is reversed and the cause is remanded.

Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
147 So. 926, 25 Ala. App. 694, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/weakley-v-state-alactapp-1933.