Weadock v. City Bond Co.

126 So. 816, 99 Fla. 474
Supreme Court of Florida·Decided March 8, 1930·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This cause haying heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the decree herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court now being advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said decree; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the said decree of the circuit court' be, and the same is hereby affirmed.

Affirmed.

Terrell, C. J., and Whitfield and Buford, J. J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Weadock v. City Bond Co., 126 So. 816, 99 Fla. 474 (Fla. 1930).

126 So. 816 (Weadock v. City Bond Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.