W.D. v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

W.D. v. State

684 So. 2d 307, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 13055, 1996 WL 721575

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedDecember 13, 1996

DocketNo. 94-04434

StatusPublished

This text of 684 So. 2d 307 (W.D. v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

W.D. v. State, 684 So. 2d 307, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 13055, 1996 WL 721575 (Fla. Ct. App. 1996).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

W.D. challenges the trial court’s oral pronouncement that he be placed in boot camp. Although the trial judge stated at the disposition hearing that he was committing W.D. to a level six placement for boot camp commitment, the written order simply commits the child to the Department of Juvenile Justice for a level six placement. We affirm the written order because boot camp placement is not authorized for petit theft. See § 39.057(3)(a) and (b), Fla.Stat. (1993).

The written order of the trial court committing the child to a level six restriction is hereby affirmed.

DANAHY, A.C.J., QUINCE, J., and HALL, VINCENT, Senior Judge, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

W.D. challenges the trial court’s oral pronouncement that he be placed in boot camp. Although the trial judge stated at the disposition hearing that he was committing W.D. to a level six placement for boot camp commitment, the written order simply commits the child to the Department of Juvenile Justice for a level six placement. We affirm the written order because boot camp placement is not authorized for petit theft. See § 39.057(3)(a) and (b), Fla.Stat. (1993).

The written order of the trial court committing the child to a level six restriction is hereby affirmed.

DANAHY, A.C.J., QUINCE, J., and HALL, VINCENT, Senior Judge, concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

684 So. 2d 307, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 13055, 1996 WL 721575, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wd-v-state-fladistctapp-1996.