Wazir v. Rumsfeld
This text of Wazir v. Rumsfeld (Wazir v. Rumsfeld) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, District of Columbia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
FADI AL MAQALAH, et al., ) ) Petitioners, ) ) Civil Action No. 06-1669 v. ) ) ROBERT GATES, et al., ) ) Respondents. ) ____________________________________) ) HAJI WAZIR, et al., ) ) Petitioners, ) ) Civil Action No. 06-1697 v. ) ) ROBERT GATES, et al., ) ) Respondents. ) ____________________________________) ) AMIN AL BAKRI, et al., ) ) Petitioners, ) ) Civil Action No. 08-1307 v. ) ) GEORGE W. BUSH, et al., ) ) Respondents. ) ____________________________________) ) REDHA AL-NAJAR, et al., ) ) Petitioners, ) ) Civil Action No. 08-2143 v. ) ) ROBERT GATES, et al., ) ) Respondents. ) ____________________________________) ORDER
Upon consideration of the parties' memoranda in these cases, argument at the motions
hearing on this date, and the entire record herein, it is hereby ORDERED that respondents shall
file with the Court, by not later than January 16, 2009, up-to-date information regarding: (1) the
number of detainees held at Bagram Air Base; (2) the number of Bagram detainees who were
captured outside Afghanistan; and (3) the number of Bagram detainees who are Afghan citizens.
If any of this information is classified, or if respondents decide for other reasons to file this
information under seal, they shall do so by not later than January 16, 2009.
SO ORDERED.
/s/ John D. Bates United States District Judge
Dated: January 7, 2009
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Wazir v. Rumsfeld, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wazir-v-rumsfeld-dcd-2009.