Waynewood v. State

552 N.W.2d 718, 1996 WL 490765
Supreme Court of Minnesota·Decided August 29, 1996·No. C7-95-2154·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

*719 ORDER

Based upon all the files, records, and proceedings herein,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the petition for review filed by Dorian Waynewood, be, and the same is, granted for the limited purpose of affirming on a different ground than that relied upon by the court of appeals. The court of appeals, in affirming the district court’s order denying post-conviction relief, ruled that a petitioner in a post-conviction proceeding may not challenge the order certifying him for prosecution as an adult. We do not address or decide that issue. It is unnecessary to address the issue because petitioner, by pleading guilty, waived his right to post-conviction appellate review of the certification order.

Granted and affirmed.

BY THE COURT:

/s/ Alexander M. Keith A.M. Keith Chief Justice

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Waynewood v. State, 552 N.W.2d 718, 1996 WL 490765 (Mich. 1996).

552 N.W.2d 718 (Waynewood v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Fletcher v. State
258 P.3d 874 (Court of Appeals of Alaska, 2011)