Wayne v. Pennsylvania National Mutual Insurance

385 A.2d 591, 254 Pa. Super. 192, 1978 Pa. Super. LEXIS 2830
CourtSuperior Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedApril 13, 1978
Docket1454
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 385 A.2d 591 (Wayne v. Pennsylvania National Mutual Insurance) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Wayne v. Pennsylvania National Mutual Insurance, 385 A.2d 591, 254 Pa. Super. 192, 1978 Pa. Super. LEXIS 2830 (Pa. Ct. App. 1978).

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

This is an appeal from the order of the lower court denying appellant Eugene Wayne’s motion to vacate a judgment of non pros, entered pursuant to Philadelphia Civil Rule 4005*(d) because of his failure to answer interrogatories filed by appellee Pennsylvania National Mutual Insurance Company. Appellant, in seeking reversal of Judge SMITH’S order, relies solely on our decision in Strickler v. United Elevator Co. (Inc.), 248 Pa.Super. 258, 375 A.2d 86 (1977). In Strickler, we reversed a lower court order re[194]*194fusing to strike a default judgment, purportedly entered in accordance with Rule 4005*(d), since the record there revealed that service of the executed interlocutory order had not been effected.

Appellant, however, cannot benefit from Strickler on this appeal since the question of appellee’s compliance with Rule 4005*(d) was not initially presented to the lower court for consideration. As this Court only recently stated in Tice v. Nationwide Life Insurance Co., 253 Pa.Super. 118, 384 A.2d 1257 (1977) (253 Pa.Super. at 126, 384 A.2d at 1261):

“It is true that no decision of this Court construing Rule 4005*(d) was given until Strickler. However, Rule 4005*(d) was in effect at all relevant times, and any contention that this . . . judgment was not entered in compliance therewith could and should have been presented to the lower court. We, therefore, will not consider appellant’s argument for the first time on appeal.”

Order affirmed.

WATKINS, former President Judge, did not participate in the consideration or decision of this case.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Walt Medical v. Electro-Nucleonics
583 A.2d 492 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1990)
Gonzales v. Procaccio Bros. Trucking Co.
407 A.2d 1338 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1979)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
385 A.2d 591, 254 Pa. Super. 192, 1978 Pa. Super. LEXIS 2830, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wayne-v-pennsylvania-national-mutual-insurance-pasuperct-1978.