Wayne v. Mayor of Savannah

56 Ga. 448
Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided January 15, 1876·Published·Cited by 8 cases

Opinion

Bleckley, Judge.

This case was brought up under the statute which provides for the expeditious review of orders granting or refusing injunction. The decision complained of was made whilst the present term of this court was in progress. The ultimate question for us, on this writ of error, is, whether the judge abused his discretion in denying a more comprehensive injunction than the one he granted. We hold, for the reasons indicated in the head-notes, that he did not. Should the complainants think proper to bring their bill to a final hearing in the court below, it may then be necessary to go deeper into [453]*453some or all of the grave questions which underlie their attack upon the revenue system of the city; but it would be premature to do so now.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Wayne v. Mayor of Savannah, 56 Ga. 448 (Ga. 1876).

56 Ga. 448 (Wayne v. Mayor of Savannah) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Lott Investment Corp. v. City of Waycross
130 S.E.2d 741 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1963)
Kight v. Gilliard
105 S.E.2d 333 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1958)
Hutchins v. Williams
95 S.E.2d 674 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1956)
Benoline Co. v. State Ex Rel. Bettman
171 N.E. 33 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1930)
Darby v. City of Vidalia
149 S.E. 223 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1929)
McVey v. McWilliams
121 S.E. 641 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1924)
Tarver v. Mayor of Dalton
67 S.E. 929 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1910)
Verdery v. Village of Summerville
8 S.E. 213 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1888)