Wayne v. Green

Missouri Court of Appeals

Wayne v. Green

163 S.W.3d 929, 2005 Mo. App. LEXIS 858, 2005 WL 1331280

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided June 7, 2005·No. ED 84481·Published

Opinion

*930 ORDER

PER CURIAM.

The defendant, Gary Green d/b/a Plaza Dental Center, appeals from the judgment entered upon a jury verdict in favor of the plaintiff, Leslie Wayne, on her action for dental malpractice. The evidence was sufficient to support the jury’s verdict and no error of law appears. An opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been provided with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order. The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

*930 ORDER

PER CURIAM.

The defendant, Gary Green d/b/a Plaza Dental Center, appeals from the judgment entered upon a jury verdict in favor of the plaintiff, Leslie Wayne, on her action for dental malpractice. The evidence was sufficient to support the jury’s verdict and no error of law appears. An opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been provided with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order. The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Wayne v. Green, 163 S.W.3d 929, 2005 Mo. App. LEXIS 858, 2005 WL 1331280 (Mo. Ct. App. 2005).

Pincite

163 S.W.3d 929 (Wayne v. Green) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.