Wayne M. Chiurazzi Law, Inc. v. MRO Corp.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Wayne M. Chiurazzi Law, Inc. v. MRO Corp.

39 A.3d 267

CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania

DecidedFebruary 22, 2012

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 39 A.3d 267 (Wayne M. Chiurazzi Law, Inc. v. MRO Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Wayne M. Chiurazzi Law, Inc. v. MRO Corp., 39 A.3d 267 (Pa. 2012).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 22nd day of February 2012, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The issues, as stated by petitioners, are:

(1) Does the Medical Records Act, 42 Pa.C.S. § 6152(a)(1) and (a)(2)(i), require medical records reproducers to disclose their estimated actual and reasonable expenses of reproducing the charts or records, and to limit their copying charges to these amounts or the statutory ceiling rates, whichever is less?

(2) If so, where a medical records reproducer failed to disclose and charge its estimated actual and reasonable expenses and instead charges the MRA’s ceiling rates, do the “voluntary payment” and “prior approval” defenses bar the records requestor from bringing a subsequent breach of contract claim to recoup the unlawful over-payment?

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI