Wayne Henry Myers v. State of Maryland
This text of 962 F.2d 7 (Wayne Henry Myers v. State of Maryland) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Wayne Henry MYERS, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
STATE OF MARYLAND, Defendant-Appellee.
No. 92-6345.
United States Court of Appeals,
Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: May 4, 1992
Decided: May 21, 1992
As Amended May 28, 1992.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Herbert F. Murray, Senior District Judge. (CA-92-623-HM)
Wayne Henry Myers, Appellant Pro Se.
D.Md.
AFFIRMED.
Before HALL, WILKINS, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.
OPINION
PER CURIAM:
Wayne Henry Myers appeals from the district court's order denying a writ of mandamus, construing his claim as a complaint filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988), and denying relief. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Myers v. State of Maryland, No. CA-92-623-HM (D. Md. Mar. 20, 1992). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
962 F.2d 7, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wayne-henry-myers-v-state-of-maryland-ca4-1992.