Wayne D. Saxton v. Secretary of the Navy John H. Dalton Department of the Navy

74 F.3d 1233, 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 39042, 1996 WL 23290
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedJanuary 23, 1996
Docket95-2571
StatusPublished

This text of 74 F.3d 1233 (Wayne D. Saxton v. Secretary of the Navy John H. Dalton Department of the Navy) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Wayne D. Saxton v. Secretary of the Navy John H. Dalton Department of the Navy, 74 F.3d 1233, 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 39042, 1996 WL 23290 (4th Cir. 1996).

Opinion

74 F.3d 1233
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Wayne D. SAXTON, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
SECRETARY of The Navy; John H. Dalton; Department of The
Navy, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 95-2571.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: January 11, 1996.
Decided: January 23, 1996.

Wayne D. Saxton, Appellant Pro Se. Charles Joseph Peters, Sr., Office of the United States Attorney, Baltimore, MD, for Appellees.

Before RUSSELL, HALL, and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant noted this appeal outside the sixty-day appeal period established by Fed. R.App. P. 4(a)(1), failed to obtain an extension of the appeal period within the additional thirty-day period provided by Fed. R.App. P. 4(a)(5), and is not entitled to relief under Fed. R.App. P. 4(a)(6). The time periods established by Fed. R.App. P. 4 are "mandatory and jurisdictional." Browder v. Director, Dep't of Corrections, 434 U.S. 257, 264 (1978) (quoting United States v. Robinson, 361 U.S. 220, 229 (1960)). The district court entered its order on May 2, 1995; Appellant's notice of appeal was filed on July 6, 1995. Appellant's failure to note a timely appeal or obtain an extension of the appeal period deprives this court of jurisdiction to consider this case. We therefore dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Robinson
361 U.S. 220 (Supreme Court, 1960)
Browder v. Director, Dept. of Corrections of Ill.
434 U.S. 257 (Supreme Court, 1978)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
74 F.3d 1233, 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 39042, 1996 WL 23290, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wayne-d-saxton-v-secretary-of-the-navy-john-h-dalt-ca4-1996.