Wayne County Board of Review v. Great Lakes Steel Corp.

300 U.S. 29, 57 S. Ct. 329, 81 L. Ed. 485, 1937 U.S. LEXIS 60
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedFebruary 1, 1937
Docket253
StatusPublished
Cited by7 cases

This text of 300 U.S. 29 (Wayne County Board of Review v. Great Lakes Steel Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Wayne County Board of Review v. Great Lakes Steel Corp., 300 U.S. 29, 57 S. Ct. 329, 81 L. Ed. 485, 1937 U.S. LEXIS 60 (1937).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Appellee brought this suit to restrain the enforcement, in relation to an assessment upon its property, of a statute of Michigan establishing a county board of review. Act No. 33, Public Acts of Michigan, First Extra Session, 1934.

The Act established a county board of review of assessments for counties having a population in excess of *30 500,000. The Act was attacked as invalid under both the state and federal constitutions. Interlocutory and permanent injunctions were sought. The District Court, three Judges sitting (28 U. S. C. 380), held that the requisite jurisdictional amount was in controversy and that there was ground for the exercise of equitable jurisdiction.

With respect to the state constitution, appellee contended that the statute, by reason of the requirement as to population, was limited in effect to Wayne County and thus was a local and special act in a case where a general act could be made applicable, and violated § 30 of Article Y of the constitution of Michigan, which provides:

“The legislature shall pass no local or special act in any case where a general act can be made applicable, and whether a general act can be made applicable shall be a judicial question.”

The District Court of the Eastern District of Michigan, composed of three judges especially versed in the jurisprudence of the State, sustained that contention and granted a permanent injunction. 12 F. Supp. 55. We are unable to conclude that the court erred in deciding this question of state law and we accordingly affirm its decree.

Decree affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Loughran
693 P.2d 1000 (Court of Appeals of Arizona, 1985)
Avis Rent-A-Car System, Inc. v. City of Romulus
237 N.W.2d 209 (Michigan Court of Appeals, 1975)
Bankhead v. Mayor of River Rouge
192 N.W.2d 289 (Michigan Court of Appeals, 1971)
Giebelhausen v. Daley
95 N.E.2d 84 (Illinois Supreme Court, 1950)
Knudson v. Linstrum
8 N.W.2d 495 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1943)
State Tax Commission v. Baltimore National Bank
199 A. 119 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 1938)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
300 U.S. 29, 57 S. Ct. 329, 81 L. Ed. 485, 1937 U.S. LEXIS 60, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wayne-county-board-of-review-v-great-lakes-steel-corp-scotus-1937.