Wayne Contracting Co. v. Borough of Allendale

96 A. 393, 88 N.J.L. 397, 1915 N.J. LEXIS 344
CourtSupreme Court of New Jersey
DecidedNovember 15, 1915
StatusPublished

This text of 96 A. 393 (Wayne Contracting Co. v. Borough of Allendale) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Wayne Contracting Co. v. Borough of Allendale, 96 A. 393, 88 N.J.L. 397, 1915 N.J. LEXIS 344 (N.J. 1915).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This ease was tried before Judge Silzer in the Passaic Circuit Court without a jury, who gave judgment in favor of the plaintiff, and defendant appealed.

The record brought up fails to show any request to the trial court, by the appealing party, to make a finding or findings of law or fact, or law and fact, or any exception or objection to the adverse finding made. On this record there is nothing to be reviewed. Blanchard Brothers v. Beveridge, 86 N. J. L. 561. See also Webster v. Freeholders of Hudson, Id. 256.

The judgment under review must be affirmed.

For affirmance—The Chancelloe, Chief Justice, Gaeeison, Swayze, Teenchaed, Paekee, Beegekt, Minturn, Kalisoh, Black, Veedeneuegh, White, Teehuhe, HepPENHEIMEE, WILLIAMS, TAYLOE, JJ. 16.

For reversal—Kone.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
96 A. 393, 88 N.J.L. 397, 1915 N.J. LEXIS 344, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wayne-contracting-co-v-borough-of-allendale-nj-1915.