Wayne C. Doty v. State of Florida

Opinion

Supreme Court of Florida

THURSDAY, APRIL 15, 2021

CASE NO.: SC18-973 Lower Tribunal No(s).:

042011CF000498CFAXMX

WAYNE C. DOTY vs. STATE OF FLORIDA

Appellant(s) Appellee(s)

Appellant’s Motion for Rehearing is hereby denied.

CANADY, C.J., and POLSTON, LABARGA, LAWSON, and MUÑIZ, JJ., concur. LABARGA, J., concurs with an opinion. COURIEL and GROSSHANS, JJ., did not participate.

LABARGA, J., concurring.

As expressed in my concur in part, dissent in part opinion in

Doty v. State, 45 Fla. L. Weekly S66 (Fla. Feb. 13, 2020), I maintain

my dissent to the use of “determinations” instead of “findings” to

describe the requirements set forth in section 921.141(2)(b)2.,

Florida Statutes (2018). However, because I concurred in the

majority’s affirmance of Doty’s death sentence, I also agree with the

majority’s decision to deny rehearing.

CASE NO.: SC18-973 Page Two

A True Copy Test:

so Served:

JANINE D. ROBINSON HON. JESSICA JOAN YEARY, PUBLIC DEFENDER BARBARA J. BUSHARIS CHARMAINE M. MILLSAPS HON. WILLIAM E. DAVIS, JUDGE LUIS E. BUSTAMANTE RAY NORMAN, CLERK HON. MARK W. MOSELEY, CHIEF JUDGE