Wayne A. Strickland v. L. Douglas Wilder Mary Sue Terry Roanoke Times & World News Natalie Davis Detective Harris, Roanoke City Police Department

Fourth Circuit

Wayne A. Strickland v. L. Douglas Wilder Mary Sue Terry Roanoke Times & World News Natalie Davis Detective Harris, Roanoke City Police Department

21 F.3d 424, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 15845, 1994 WL 83760

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedMarch 14, 1994

Docket93-7364

StatusPublished

This text of 21 F.3d 424 (Wayne A. Strickland v. L. Douglas Wilder Mary Sue Terry Roanoke Times & World News Natalie Davis Detective Harris, Roanoke City Police Department) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Wayne A. Strickland v. L. Douglas Wilder Mary Sue Terry Roanoke Times & World News Natalie Davis Detective Harris, Roanoke City Police Department, 21 F.3d 424, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 15845, 1994 WL 83760 (4th Cir. 1994).

Pincite

Opinion

21 F.3d 424
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Wayne A. STRICKLAND, Plaintiff Appellant,
v.
L. Douglas WILDER; Mary Sue Terry; Roanoke Times & World
News; Natalie Davis; Detective Harris, Roanoke
City Police Department, Defendants Appellees.

No. 93-7364.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: Feb. 17, 1994.
Decided March 14, 1994.

Wayne A. Strickland, appellant pro se.

W.D.Va.

AFFIRMED.

Before RUSSELL, MURNAGHAN, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses no abuse of discretion and that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Strickland v. Wilder, No. CA-93-957-R (W.D. Va. Dec. 15, 1993). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

21 F.3d 424
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Wayne A. STRICKLAND, Plaintiff Appellant,
v.
L. Douglas WILDER; Mary Sue Terry; Roanoke Times & World
News; Natalie Davis; Detective Harris, Roanoke
City Police Department, Defendants Appellees.

No. 93-7364.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: Feb. 17, 1994.
Decided March 14, 1994.

Wayne A. Strickland, appellant pro se.

W.D.Va.

AFFIRMED.

Before RUSSELL, MURNAGHAN, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses no abuse of discretion and that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Strickland v. Wilder, No. CA-93-957-R (W.D. Va. Dec. 15, 1993). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

21 F.3d 424, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 15845, 1994 WL 83760, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wayne-a-strickland-v-l-douglas-wilder-mary-sue-ter-ca4-1994.