Waymon Jaeshell Stepherson v. State
This text of Waymon Jaeshell Stepherson v. State (Waymon Jaeshell Stepherson v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON
ORDER ON MOTION
Cause number: 01-16-00936-CR Style: Waymon Jaeshell Stepherson v. The State of Texas Date motion filed*: August 2, 2017 Type of motion: Motion for Extension of Time to Amend or Supplement Appellant’s Brief Party filing motion: Pro Se Appellant Document to be filed: Motion to Amend or Supplement Appellant’s Brief
Ordered that motion is: Granted Denied Dismissed (e.g., want of jurisdiction, moot) Other: _____________________________________ On July 19, 2017, appellant’s appointed counsel timely filed appellant’s brief on the merits and has not sought to withdraw from representing appellant. See TEX. R. APP. P. 6.5. Accordingly, appellant’s pro se motion for an extension of time to amend or supplement his brief is dismissed as moot because he is currently represented by counsel and is not entitled to hybrid representation. See Ex parte Taylor, 36 S.W.3d 883, 887 (Tex. Crim. App. 2001) (stating “[a]ppellants are not allowed to have hybrid representation” and appellant did not have right to file documents with appellate court while represented by counsel).
Judge’s signature: /s/ Laura C. Higley
Date: August 8, 2017
November 7, 2008 Revision
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Waymon Jaeshell Stepherson v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/waymon-jaeshell-stepherson-v-state-texapp-2017.