Waybourn v. Waybourn

36 S.W.2d 258
CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedFebruary 18, 1931
DocketNo. 7571.
StatusPublished

This text of 36 S.W.2d 258 (Waybourn v. Waybourn) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Waybourn v. Waybourn, 36 S.W.2d 258 (Tex. Ct. App. 1931).

Opinion

BLAIR, J.

On the threshold of this appeal appellees move that appellant’s brief filed herein be not considered, and that the judgment be affirmed because the brief contains no assignments of error. The brief contains no assignments of error, and the duty of this court is well stated in 3 Tex. Jur., 837, § 588, as follows:

“When the brief contains no assignments of error it will not be considered, and the assignments filed below are not properly before the court. Consequently the assignments are not entitled to consideration, and the appellate court will confine itself to a review of fundamental error apparent on the face of the record. In the absence of fundamental error the judgment or order appealed from will be affirmed.”

See also the numerous cases cited in the footnotes by this authority which support the rule quoted.

We have carefully examined the record for fundamental error and find no such error, and the judgment of the trial court will be affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
36 S.W.2d 258, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/waybourn-v-waybourn-texapp-1931.