Wax v. Sacks

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Wax v. Sacks

282 A.D. 1045, 126 N.Y.S.2d 894, 1953 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5769

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 15, 1953

StatusPublished

This text of 282 A.D. 1045 (Wax v. Sacks) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Wax v. Sacks, 282 A.D. 1045, 126 N.Y.S.2d 894, 1953 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5769 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1953).

Pincite

Opinion

Order unanimously modified so as to eliminate the provision that paragraphs 11(a), 11(d), 11(f), 11(h) and 11 (i) shall be omitted from any amended complaint. We feel it would be preferable not to restrict matter in the new pleading in advance. The propriety or sufficiency may be tested by appropriate motion. As so modified the order is affirmed. Present — Callahan, J. P., Breitel, Bastow, Botein and Bergan, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order unanimously modified so as to eliminate the provision that paragraphs 11(a), 11(d), 11(f), 11(h) and 11 (i) shall be omitted from any amended complaint. We feel it would be preferable not to restrict matter in the new pleading in advance. The propriety or sufficiency may be tested by appropriate motion. As so modified the order is affirmed. Present — Callahan, J. P., Breitel, Bastow, Botein and Bergan, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

282 A.D. 1045, 126 N.Y.S.2d 894, 1953 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5769, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wax-v-sacks-nyappdiv-1953.