Wax v. Glaubman
This text of 3 A.D.2d 714 (Wax v. Glaubman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appeal from a judgment, entered upon a dismissal of the second amended complaint, as a consequence of the appellants’ refusal, before and after the impanelling of the jury, to proceed to trial because of the lack of a witness. Judgment unanimously affirmed, with costs. Under the circumstances presented in the record, there was no abuse of discretion on the part of the trial court in refusing to grant appellants’ request for an adjournment. Present—Nolan, P. J., Beldock, Murphy, Ughetta and Hallinan, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
3 A.D.2d 714, 159 N.Y.S.2d 222, 1957 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6535, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wax-v-glaubman-nyappdiv-1957.