Wax v. Annenberg

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Wax v. Annenberg

241 A.D. 824

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided April 15, 1934·Published

Opinion

Order setting aside the verdict and- granting a new trial unless plaintiff stipulate to reduce reversed on the law and the facts, with costs, motion denied, verdict reinstated and judgment directed to be entered thereon, with costs. In our opinion, it cannot be said that the verdict of the jury was excessive or that it was the result of passion, prejudice or other improper motive. Lazansky, P. J., Kapper, Carswell, Scudder and Tompkins, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order setting aside the verdict and- granting a new trial unless plaintiff stipulate to reduce reversed on the law and the facts, with costs, motion denied, verdict reinstated and judgment directed to be entered thereon, with costs. In our opinion, it cannot be said that the verdict of the jury was excessive or that it was the result of passion, prejudice or other improper motive. Lazansky, P. J., Kapper, Carswell, Scudder and Tompkins, JJ., concur.

Wax v. Annenberg, 241 A.D. 824 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1934).

Pincite

241 A.D. 824 (Wax v. Annenberg) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.