Wax v. Annenberg
This text of 241 A.D. 824 (Wax v. Annenberg) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order setting aside the verdict and- granting a new trial unless plaintiff stipulate to reduce reversed on the law and the facts, with costs, motion denied, verdict reinstated and judgment directed to be entered thereon, with costs. In our opinion, it cannot be said that the verdict of the jury was excessive or that it was the result of passion, prejudice or other improper motive. Lazansky, P. J., Kapper, Carswell, Scudder and Tompkins, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
241 A.D. 824, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wax-v-annenberg-nyappdiv-1934.