Wavrunek v. Frank C. Schilling Co.

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Wavrunek v. Frank C. Schilling Co.

192 N.W. 378, 180 Wis. 117, 1923 Wisc. LEXIS 76

Wisconsin Supreme Court·Decided March 6, 1923·Published

Opinion

Eschweilek, J.

An examination of the record convinces us that no actionable negligence on the part of defendant’s driver in the management of the truck was shown, so that even if plaintiff’s assignments of error were any of them well taken, nevertheless the result reached in the court below was so clearly right that it is our duty under sec. 3072m, Stats., to affirm the judgment without expressing any opinion upon the specific objections raised by plaintiff.

By the Court. — Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Eschweilek, J.

An examination of the record convinces us that no actionable negligence on the part of defendant’s driver in the management of the truck was shown, so that even if plaintiff’s assignments of error were any of them well taken, nevertheless the result reached in the court below was so clearly right that it is our duty under sec. 3072m, Stats., to affirm the judgment without expressing any opinion upon the specific objections raised by plaintiff.

By the Court. — Judgment affirmed.

Wavrunek v. Frank C. Schilling Co., 192 N.W. 378, 180 Wis. 117, 1923 Wisc. LEXIS 76 (Wis. 1923).

Pincite

192 N.W. 378 (Wavrunek v. Frank C. Schilling Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.