Wausau Underwriters Insurance Co. v. Taubler

448 So. 2d 545, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 12359
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMarch 22, 1984
DocketNo. 83-859
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 448 So. 2d 545 (Wausau Underwriters Insurance Co. v. Taubler) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Wausau Underwriters Insurance Co. v. Taubler, 448 So. 2d 545, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 12359 (Fla. Ct. App. 1984).

Opinion

SHARP, Judge.

Wausau Underwriters Insurance Company has filed a timely appeal from a summary judgment entered in favor of Raymond Taubler. We reverse the summary judgment because Taubler recovered an amount equal to his uninsured motorist coverage through a settlement with the tortfeasor’s liability carrier.

Taubler was injured in a two-automobile accident involving himself and William Strauch. Strauch was driving his parents’ automobile without permission at the time of the accident. The Strauehs’ automobile liability policy with Aetna Casualty and Surety Company provided coverage in the amount of $50,000.00 per person. Taubler was covered by his stepfather’s uninsured/underinsured motorist coverage with Wausau, which totalled $20,000.00. Tau-bler eventually released the Strauehs and Aetna Casualty and Surety Company for $20,000.00. Taubler then brought suit against Wausau to recover the total amount of underinsured motorist coverage. The trial court entered a summary judgment in favor of Taubler for $20,000.00.

When a tortfeasor has liability insurance with policy limits equal to or greater than those contained in uninsured/underinsured motorist coverage pos[546]*546sessed by an injured party, the injured party cannot recover under his or her own uninsured/underinsured motorist policy. Scharfschwerdt v. Allstate Insurance Company, 430 So.2d 578 (Fla. 5th DCA 1983); see Dewberry v. Auto-Owners Insurance Company, 363 So.2d 1077 (Fla. 1978). Because the Strauchs’ liability insurance policy limits were greater than those contained in Taubler’s underinsured motorist policy, Taubler was not entitled to recover under that policy. Therefore, we must reverse.

REVERSED.

DAUKSCH and FRANK D. UP-CHURCH, Jr., JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Allstate Ins. Co. v. Rush
777 So. 2d 1027 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2000)
Morrison v. Universal Underwriters Ins. Co.
543 So. 2d 425 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1989)
Government Employees Ins. Co. v. Battaglia
503 So. 2d 358 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1987)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
448 So. 2d 545, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 12359, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wausau-underwriters-insurance-co-v-taubler-fladistctapp-1984.