Waugh, Guardian v. Ochsenrider

149 N.E. 102, 88 Ind. App. 715, 1925 Ind. App. LEXIS 214
CourtIndiana Court of Appeals
DecidedOctober 15, 1925
DocketNo. 12,503.
StatusPublished

This text of 149 N.E. 102 (Waugh, Guardian v. Ochsenrider) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Waugh, Guardian v. Ochsenrider, 149 N.E. 102, 88 Ind. App. 715, 1925 Ind. App. LEXIS 214 (Ind. Ct. App. 1925).

Opinion

Nichols, P. J.

This appeal presents the same facts, as appears by the special findings,as in the caseof Keener v.Ochsenrider (1925), 85 Ind. App. 156, 149 N. E. 101. That case was an appeal from the judgment of the Wells Circuit Court denying appellants’ separate petitions to cancel the appointment of appellee Ochsenrider as administratrix with thewill annexed of the estate of Jacob Leist, deceased, while theinstant case is an appeal from a judgment of the Wells Circuit Court granting the petition of appellees to cancel the appointment of appellant as guardian to settle the estate of said Jacob Leist, deceased, without administration. On the authority of that case, the instant case is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Keener v. Ochsenrider
149 N.E. 101 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1925)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
149 N.E. 102, 88 Ind. App. 715, 1925 Ind. App. LEXIS 214, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/waugh-guardian-v-ochsenrider-indctapp-1925.