WATTY v. State
78 So. 3d 16, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 16997, 2011 WL 5061358
Opinion
Even indulging both of the very dubious propositions that the single ruling complained of on appeal was (a) properly preserved below and (b) in fact erroneous, we nonetheless affirm the conviction and sentence under review on the ground that, beyond a reasonable doubt, the ruling complained of could not have contributed to the verdict and was thus harmless. See Franqui v. State, 59 So.3d 82, 102 (Fla. 2011).
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
WATTY v. State, 78 So. 3d 16, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 16997, 2011 WL 5061358 (Fla. Ct. App. 2011).
78 So. 3d 16 (WATTY v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Franqui v. State
59 So. 3d 82 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2011)