Watts, Watts & Co. v. Unione Austriaca Di Navigazione
239 F. 1023, 152 C.C.A. 667, 1917 U.S. App. LEXIS 2321
This text of 239 F. 1023 (Watts, Watts & Co. v. Unione Austriaca Di Navigazione) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Watts, Watts & Co. v. Unione Austriaca Di Navigazione, 239 F. 1023, 152 C.C.A. 667, 1917 U.S. App. LEXIS 2321 (2d Cir. 1917).
Opinion
Motion denied on the ground that, the term having passed, this court has noi power to recall its mandate. The order entered by Judge Veeder after the certiorari was granted is a nullity. Judge Veeder sitting in admiralty.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Nachod v. Engineering & Research Corp.
108 F.2d 594 (Second Circuit, 1939)
Sundh Electric Co. v. Cutler-Hammer Mfg. Co.
244 F. 163 (Second Circuit, 1917)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
239 F. 1023, 152 C.C.A. 667, 1917 U.S. App. LEXIS 2321, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/watts-watts-co-v-unione-austriaca-di-navigazione-ca2-1917.