Watts v. Watts

Missouri Court of Appeals

Watts v. Watts

846 S.W.2d 802, 1993 Mo. App. LEXIS 254, 1993 WL 43745

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided February 23, 1993·No. No. 61898·Published

Opinion

ORDER

Husband appeals from a denial of his Pendente Lite (PDL) motion. The trial court has especially wide discretion in the award or denial of temporary allowances. The order here is supported by substantial evidence and is not against the weight of the evidence; no error of law appears. A written opinion would have no precedential value. The order of the trial court denying temporary allowances is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

Husband appeals from a denial of his Pendente Lite (PDL) motion. The trial court has especially wide discretion in the award or denial of temporary allowances. The order here is supported by substantial evidence and is not against the weight of the evidence; no error of law appears. A written opinion would have no precedential value. The order of the trial court denying temporary allowances is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Watts v. Watts, 846 S.W.2d 802, 1993 Mo. App. LEXIS 254, 1993 WL 43745 (Mo. Ct. App. 1993).

Pincite

846 S.W.2d 802 (Watts v. Watts) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.