Watts v. Unknown Officer

593 F. App'x 254

• Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
• Decided: February 19, 2015
• Docket: No. 14-7633
• Status: Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

William T. Watts, II, appeals the district court’s order adopting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing his complaint under Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388, 91 S.Ct. 1999, 29 L.Ed.2d 619 (1971), as frivolous and malicious pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2012). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Watts v. Unknown Officer, No. 8:14-cv-03223-TMC (D.S.C. Oct. 8, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.