Watts v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Watts v. State

405 S.W.3d 569, 2013 WL 3328901, 2013 Mo. App. LEXIS 807

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided June 28, 2013·No. No. ED 98910·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Kimmie Watts appeals from the motion court’s denial of his motion to reopen his Rule 29.15 post-conviction proceedings based on his claim that he was abandoned by his appointed post-conviction relief (“PCR”) counsel. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find' no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Kimmie Watts appeals from the motion court’s denial of his motion to reopen his Rule 29.15 post-conviction proceedings based on his claim that he was abandoned by his appointed post-conviction relief (“PCR”) counsel. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find' no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Watts v. State, 405 S.W.3d 569, 2013 WL 3328901, 2013 Mo. App. LEXIS 807 (Mo. Ct. App. 2013).

Pincite

405 S.W.3d 569 (Watts v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.