Watts v. State

574 S.E.2d 567, 258 Ga. App. 579, 2002 Fulton County D. Rep. 3474, 2002 Ga. App. LEXIS 1450
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided November 12, 2002·No. A02A2028·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Miller, Judge.

Jerry Watts appeals from his convictions for violations of the Georgia Controlled Substances Act. However, in his notice of appeal, Watts did not request that a trial transcript be included as part of the appellate record, nor did he request any records relating to his sentencing. Indeed, he requested only that the indictment and final disposition be included in the appellate record. The absence of the trial and sentencing transcripts makes it impossible for this Court to review Watts’s various enumerations of error concerning factual merger, double jeopardy, and improper sentencing. Cf. Kegler v. State, 267 Ga. 147, 148 (3) (475 SE2d 593) (1996). “It is the burden of the complaining party, including pro se appellants, to compile a complete record of what happened at the trial level, and when this is not done, there is nothing for the appellate court to review.” (Citation and [580] punctuation omitted.) Farris v. State, 236 Ga. App. 241 (511 SE2d 601) (1999). Accordingly, we affirm.

Decided November 12, 2002 Reconsideration denied. November 25, 2002 Jerry Watts, pro se. T. Joseph Campbell, District Attorney, Mickey R. Thacker, Erik J. Pirozzi, Assistant District Attorneys, for appellee.

Judgment affirmed.

Blackburn, C. J., and Johnson, P. J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Watts v. State, 574 S.E.2d 567, 258 Ga. App. 579, 2002 Fulton County D. Rep. 3474, 2002 Ga. App. LEXIS 1450 (Ga. Ct. App. 2002).

574 S.E.2d 567 (Watts v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Holman v. the State
765 S.E.2d 614 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 2014)
Ulysses Holman v. State
Court of Appeals of Georgia, 2014
Watts v. State
581 S.E.2d 625 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 2003)