Watts v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Watts v. State

29 S.E.2d 662, 70 Ga. App. 823, 1944 Ga. App. LEXIS 114

Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided February 19, 1944·No. 30369.·Published

Opinion

Gardner, J.

The questions of law and fact in this case are almost identical with those in Day v. State, ante. The opinion in the latter case is controlling on ai' assignments of error in the instant case. Therefore the judge did non eiu in overruling the certiorari for any reason assigned. Judgment affirmed

Broyles, G. J., and MacIntyre, J., oonour.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Gardner, J.

The questions of law and fact in this case are almost identical with those in Day v. State, ante. The opinion in the latter case is controlling on ai' assignments of error in the instant case. Therefore the judge did non eiu in overruling the certiorari for any reason assigned. Judgment affirmed

Broyles, G. J., and MacIntyre, J., oonour.

Watts v. State, 29 S.E.2d 662, 70 Ga. App. 823, 1944 Ga. App. LEXIS 114 (Ga. Ct. App. 1944).

Pincite

29 S.E.2d 662 (Watts v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.