Watts v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Watts v. State

136 S.E. 323, 36 Ga. App. 215, 1926 Ga. App. LEXIS 881

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedDecember 14, 1926

Docket17701

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 136 S.E. 323 (Watts v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Watts v. State, 136 S.E. 323, 36 Ga. App. 215, 1926 Ga. App. LEXIS 881 (Ga. Ct. App. 1926).

Pincite

Opinion

Broyles, C. J.

“Where one is sentenced for'a violation of a criminal statute,' and, under the provisions of the act of the General Assembly approved August 16, 1913 (Ga. L. 1913, p. 112; Park’s Penal Code, § 1081 (a), (h), (e), (d)), on certain conditions named in the order, is allowed to serve the sentence ‘outside the confines of the chain-gang, jail, or other place of detention,’ and, while serving the sentence, violates the terms of his parole, and the court, upon the defendant being brought before it and after due examination, revokes its leave to the defendant to serve his term outside the chain-gang or other place of detention, this is not such a final judgment as is subject to review on a bill of exceptions.” Antonopoulas v. State, 26 Ga. App. 787 (107 S. E. 359). Under that ruling the case sub judiee can not be entertained by this court.

Writ of error dismissed.

Lulce, J., concurs. Bloodworth, J., absent on account of illness.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Broyles, C. J.

“Where one is sentenced for'a violation of a criminal statute,' and, under the provisions of the act of the General Assembly approved August 16, 1913 (Ga. L. 1913, p. 112; Park’s Penal Code, § 1081 (a), (h), (e), (d)), on certain conditions named in the order, is allowed to serve the sentence ‘outside the confines of the chain-gang, jail, or other place of detention,’ and, while serving the sentence, violates the terms of his parole, and the court, upon the defendant being brought before it and after due examination, revokes its leave to the defendant to serve his term outside the chain-gang or other place of detention, this is not such a final judgment as is subject to review on a bill of exceptions.” Antonopoulas v. State, 26 Ga. App. 787 (107 S. E. 359). Under that ruling the case sub judiee can not be entertained by this court.

Writ of error dismissed.

Lulce, J., concurs. Bloodworth, J., absent on account of illness.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

136 S.E. 323, 36 Ga. App. 215, 1926 Ga. App. LEXIS 881, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/watts-v-state-gactapp-1926.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack