Watts v. State

70 S.E. 46, 8 Ga. App. 694, 1911 Ga. App. LEXIS 107
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided January 31, 1911·No. 3027·Published·Cited by 8 cases

Opinion

Powell, J.

The only point that we care to make clearer is the one-mentioned in the second headnote. The accused was indicted for killing a man named Parks. The State offered a witness who testified that the accused had voluntarily said to him, “I killed Joe Parks and a negro.” The defendant objected to the admission of this testimony, on the ground that the prisoner was on trial for the killing of Joe Parks, and not on trial for the killing of the negro; that the killing of the negro was. a specific, distinct offense, and that, it was not competent for the State to give in evidence testimony as to distinct and separate offenses. ' Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Watts v. State, 70 S.E. 46, 8 Ga. App. 694, 1911 Ga. App. LEXIS 107 (Ga. Ct. App. 1911).

70 S.E. 46 (Watts v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Lee v. State
269 S.E.2d 65 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1980)
Lakes v. State
261 S.E.2d 744 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1979)
Ledford v. State
113 S.E.2d 628 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1960)
Childers v. State
110 S.E.2d 703 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1959)
Calhoun v. State
78 S.E.2d 425 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1953)
Reed v. State
29 S.E.2d 505 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1944)
Goldberg v. State
92 S.E. 957 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1917)
McDuffie v. State
86 S.E. 821 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1915)