Watts v. State
This text of 60 S.E. 287 (Watts v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
No phase of the evidence indicates manslaughter; the defendant’s statement sets up nothing less than a complete justification; the trial judge very property declined to charge the law of voluntary manslaughter; and the jury, notwithstanding the instructions of the judge, having returned a verdict finding the defendant guilty of that offense, a new trial ought to have been granted. This proposition is so well settled by repeated rulings as to require no citation of authority.
Since there is to be another trial, we suggest that in the light [607]*607■of the conflict as to whether the persons killed had pistols on the night of the difficulty, testimony as to their habit of carrying weapons is of some relevancy, and may be admitted as illustrating this issue. Judgment reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
60 S.E. 287, 3 Ga. App. 606, 1908 Ga. App. LEXIS 385, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/watts-v-state-gactapp-1908.