Watts v. State

60 S.E. 287, 3 Ga. App. 606, 1908 Ga. App. LEXIS 385
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided February 11, 1908·No. 942·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Powell, J.

No phase of the evidence indicates manslaughter; the defendant’s statement sets up nothing less than a complete justification; the trial judge very property declined to charge the law of voluntary manslaughter; and the jury, notwithstanding the instructions of the judge, having returned a verdict finding the defendant guilty of that offense, a new trial ought to have been granted. This proposition is so well settled by repeated rulings as to require no citation of authority.

Since there is to be another trial, we suggest that in the light [607] ■of the conflict as to whether the persons killed had pistols on the night of the difficulty, testimony as to their habit of carrying weapons is of some relevancy, and may be admitted as illustrating this issue. Judgment reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Watts v. State, 60 S.E. 287, 3 Ga. App. 606, 1908 Ga. App. LEXIS 385 (Ga. Ct. App. 1908).

60 S.E. 287 (Watts v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Bates v. State
61 S.E. 888 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1908)